The Latest on The UPC

UPC emphasises importance of formal service

Daedalus Prime v. Xiaomi and others Order of 18 April 2024 ORD_20986/2024[1] Daedalus Prime LLC filed a patent infringement action based on EP2792100 at the UPC local division in Hamburg. While some of the named defendants were located in EU count...

Variable Views on Confidentiality

In recent months the Local Divisions of Mannheim, Paris and Düsseldorf have given guidance on access to confidential material. These judgments address the procedure for protecting confidential material a party wishes to rely upon, but reach varyin...

Adding a patent to existing proceedings

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd v Netgear Inc & Ors (UPC_CFI_9/2023) Order[1] of Court of Appeal on 11 March 2024 (UPC_CoA_44/2024); Appeal against ORD_593106/2024 of the CFI panel dated 18 January 2024[2] following ORD_593105/2023 and ORD_587438/20...

Error in Defendant not Fatal to Revocation Claim

Juul Labs International, Inc. v. NJOY Netherlands B.V. (UPC_CoA_433/2023, UPC_CoA_435/2023, UPC_CoA_436/2023, UPC_CoA_437/2023, UPC_CoA_438/202)1 Orders of 3 April 2024 (ORD_598223/2023, ORD_598225/2023, ORD_598224/2023, ORD_598226/2023, ORD_598227/...

UPC Refuses to Admit Further Amendment Requests

Meril Italy v Edwards Lifesciences UPC_CFI_255/2023 (Revocation action at Paris Central Division) Order of 28 February 2024 (ORD_7283/2024)[1] This order relates to the action brought by Meril Italy for revocation of Edwards’ patent EP 3646 8...

Joining a party

Seoul Viosys., Ltd v Laser Components SAS (UPC_CFI_440/2023) Order dated 12 February 2024 (ORD_3311/2024) In this infringement case before the Paris Local Division the defendant, Laser Components SAS, sought to add a third party, Photon Wave Co. L...

(Non)-Bifurcation at the UPC

Plant-e, Plant-e Knowledge v. Arkyne Technologies S.L. UPC_CFI_239/2023 Order of 15 February 2024 (ORD_8243/2024)[1] The issue of whether the UPC would bifurcate, namely try a patent infringement case separately from the related counterclaim for re...

Should a stay be ordered?

10X Genomics, Inc. v Nanostring Technologies Inc. & Ors (UPC_CFI_2/2023; UPC_CoA_335/2023) Order of Court of Appeal on 26 February 2024 On 19 September 2023, the Munich Local Division issued a preliminary injunction against the Defendants, Nan...

A caution on the availability of extensions

ITCiCo Spain S.L. v Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaf (UPC_CFI_412/2023) Order dated 9 February 2023 (ORD_4804/2024) Background A revocation action was brought in the Paris Central Division by BMW AG (“the Respondent”) agains...

Access to documents – representation

Ocado v Autostore – appeal on access to documents UPC_CoA_404/2023 Order of 8 February 2024[1] In the Appeal by Ocado against the Order[2] from the Nordic Baltic regional division granting a request under Rule 262.1(b) for inspection of the s...

Discretionary review or appeal?

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd v Netgear Inc & Ors (UPC_CFI_9/2023) Order of Court of Appeal on 11 January 2024 (UPC_CoA_486/2023); Appeal against ORD_588901/2023 dated 11 December 2023 Huawei sued Netgear in Munich Local Division for infringemen...

Discretion allowing in expert declarations

Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH & Ors v Amgen Inc (UPC_CFI_1/2023) Order dated 24 January 2024 (ORD_2233/2024) The pleadings in this revocation action had progressed to the rejoinder by defendant (Rule 43.1(d)). Such rejoinder is “limited...

EX PARTE PI GRANTED

Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH vs Mammut Sports Group AG and Mammut Sports Group GmbH Düsseldorf Local Division Order of 11 December 2023[1] Introduction Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH (in the following “Applicant”) owns the EP 3 466 49...

Requirements for an intervention

In the matter of an appeal by Ocado Innovation Limited and applications to intervene by (1) Mathys & Squire LLP and (2) Bristows (Ireland ) LLP Order of Court of Appeal dated 10 January 2024 By Order of 17 October 2023, the Nordic Baltic region...